csi

My name is Detective Jada.Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene at a 2 bedroom beach house. The alleged victim was a freshmen named Felix Navidad but sadly no one loved him. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra Goode and I believe that she killed him and since she was under his will she would go to the bank and get the money.This suspect's guilt was confimed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene. The most incriminating piece of evidence was the powder found on her and Vera Cruise's shoe. The evidence was found on the floor in Area seven,eight and six. The test performed was the Powder Study.The results of the test were that the cornstarch was used with food die to look like blood.This connects the suspect to the crime because she tried to frame someone else for killing Felix navidad. The next piece of evidence collected was that there was Kendra's finger prints on Felix's cup. It was found that Kendra handled the cup. The test I performed was the fingerprint test. This connects the suspect to the crime because the results of the test were that the fingerprints were clearly Kendra's and it's possible that Kendra did something with the cup. Another piece of evidence collected was the secret note.It was found at Area eight. The test performed was the handwrighting test.The results of the test were that it was Kendra's handwriting and not Vera's. This connects the suspect to the crime because Kendra triedto frame Vera by sighning Vera's name at the bottom. The last piece of evidence collected was Felixes pop number was a ten and a ten is a base.It was found in Area six. The test performed was a Ph test. The results of the test was found that regular cola was a acid and Felixes cola was a base. This connects (Incomplete information.) According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. Kendra, Vera,Alfrado and Gene went to go to a party. They arrived at Felixes party and Kendra said she was going upstairs but their was no upstair, so then she went and put poisenis ice cubes (How do you knowthe ice cubes were poisoned? Did you perform a test? If so, why didn't you discuss the results?) in a pop and gave it to Felix. Therefore,Kendra committed the crime of murder for wanting the money that Felix gave them under his will. **Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || __**The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.**__  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || __** Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  **__ || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || __**The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene.**__ || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || **__ Conclusion summarizes information.  __** || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || /57  ||